Jump to content


News!


  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

#21 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 01 April 2011 - 10:21 AM

View PostThatDude407, on 01 April 2011 - 05:57 AM, said:

thats bullshit, he shouldnt be court marshalled for that. was he out of line? maybe a little. but the stop-loss program is total bullshit.
Yeah, you could see it that way. But imagine this guy goes and looses it. Then we would say that all the signs were there and how come nothing was done about it.

What I don't get is how the Armed forces still want to hold service members in against their will and specially in a situation like this. I would have discharged that soldier a long time ago, which I think would be the most logical thing to do. Keeps all other soldiers safe, they get rid of a problem and they wouldn't hold someone against their will. They should just give you the option of going back and serving some more, just as all volunteered to serve they should be given the option to volunteer some more or be done with what they agreed to. I mean they have already served; why not let others who are willing do the same.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#22 Pete

Pete

    Screen Door Ripper

  • Administrators
  • 3090 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey (Monmouth County)

Posted 01 April 2011 - 11:17 AM

I did not know about the stop loss program. This needs more coverage for the American people to know about. Hold a soldier over in combat against his will is un-American. That's some shit that Hitler and Cold war Russia did, not the Land of the free brave! Also, why would you want some one fighting under such extreme conditions that doesn't want to be there. The Army will obviously argue that the soldiers knew about stop loss going in, but I bet it was more constructive notice than actual notice. Plus you are informing and 18 year of something that may happen to him 3 years from now. I don't know about you, but when I was 18 I couldn't see past the next couple of hours and basically only cared about the next time I was going to get laid.
"Golf is a game in which you yell fore, shoot six and write down five"
Posted Image

#23 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 01 April 2011 - 11:23 AM

View PostPete, on 01 April 2011 - 11:17 AM, said:

I did not know about the stop loss program. This needs more coverage for the American people to know about. Hold a soldier over in combat against his will is un-American. That's some shit that Hitler and Cold war Russia did, not the Land of the free brave! Also, why would you want some one fighting under such extreme conditions that doesn't want to be there. The Army will obviously argue that the soldiers knew about stop loss going in, but I bet it was more constructive notice than actual notice. Plus you are informing and 18 year of something that may happen to him 3 years from now. I don't know about you, but when I was 18 I couldn't see past the next couple of hours and basically only cared about the next time I was going to get laid.
Yeaph, sounds about right. Read:

New Army Stop-Loss Policy

Soldiers affected by Stop-Loss will now be allowed to request voluntary separation from the Army under a new policy released Sept. 5 (2002).

The first increment of Stop-Loss was approved by Reginald Brown, the assistant secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs on Nov. 30 to retain the critical skills needed to support the War on Terrorism.

Under the new policy, soldiers will generally be subject to Stop-Loss for no more than 12 months -- even though their military occupation specialty may remain affected by Stop-Loss in support of the global war on terrorism, said officials from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G1.

Enlisted soldiers under Stop-Loss can now voluntarily separate on the one-year anniversary of their original expiration of service or ETS date.

Officers and warrant officers, not retirement eligible, can apply to leave one year from the end of their original service obligation date. Officers and warrant officers who don't have a service obligation may request separation 12 months after they were first affected by Stop-Loss.

All retirement-eligible soldiers can apply for retirement one year from their original retirement eligibility date (defined as 20 years active federal service) or one year from when Stop-Loss took effect if the soldier was retirement eligible on the effective date of Stop-Loss.

Enlisted soldiers serving on an indefinite enlistment can apply to be separated 12 months from the date they became subject to Stop-Loss.

The most recent policy does not supersede Stop-Loss 4, which was approved on June 4 with an effective date of June 19, G1 officials said. The new 12-month policy supplements Stop-Loss 4, officials added. Stop-Loss 4 kept about 260 soldiers on active duty who had potential separation or retirement dates between now and Sept. 30, and it released another 370 who had been impacted by previous Stop-Loss decisions. The total number of active-duty soldiers affected by Stop-Loss during this fiscal year has been 2,900.

An expiration date for the Stop-Loss program cannot be determined at this time, G1 officials said. The Army will continues to evaluate and review the need to further expand or contract the Stop-Loss program, based on operational necessity, on a monthly basis, G1 officials said. Presently, no additional military occupational specialties have been added to Stop-Loss, nor have any been lifted.

The majority of the soldiers affected by Stop-Loss at this are: military intelligence, special operations, aviators and military policemen. For more information on what MOSs remain on the list of critical skills see www.odcsper.army.mil/directorates/mp/stoploss.

"After seven months, the time has come to provide more predictability for when Stop-Loss will be lifted with respect to individual soldiers," said G1 officials. "Stop-Loss was not designed to preclude soldiers from voluntarily separating or retiring from the Army for an indefinite period of time."

Currently mobilized reserve-component soldiers do not fall under the Stop-Loss program. However, guidance on a unit-based Stop-Loss program is currently being drafted to cover the reserve components, G1 officials said.

"For the active-component soldier, Stop-Loss is based on skill. Under the guidance being drafted, mobilized units can be kept indefinitely under Stop-Loss regardless of military occupational specialty," officials said.

Stop-Loss does not affect soldiers being processed for involuntary administrative separation under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Nor does it affect, in most cases, soldier facing mandatory retirement, those being processed for physical disability or pending separation for the convenience of the government, G1 officials said.

Above Article by Staff Sgt. Marcia Triggs , Published in Army News Service
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#24 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 26 April 2011 - 11:32 AM

View Postamiaturtle, on 17 November 2010 - 12:58 PM, said:

Via: www.military.com / Stars and Stripes article by Leo Shane III
Link: http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl

Life Won’t Be Same for MoH Recipient Giunta
November 16, 2010
Stars and Stripes|by Leo Shane III

WASHINGTON -- Staff Sgt. Salvatore Giunta has made no attempt to hide just how uncomfortable he is with the attention and accolades surrounding the Medal of Honor that he’ll formally receive on Tuesday.

“I’m a regular line Soldier, so this is a new world, sitting out here under these lights in the field with these cameras pointed on us, talking with a little, secret earpiece,” he said during a Pentagon press conference in September, shortly after his name and story were made public. “It’s definitely interesting and exciting.”

It was also a preview of a new reality for Giunta, the first living Medal of Honor recipient for actions in the current wars.

He is no longer a regular line Soldier. He’s the first living active-duty servicemember to be awarded the nation’s highest honor for battlefield heroics since the Vietnam War, a role that automatically sets him apart from his peers.

“The minute that medal goes around your neck, your life changes,” said Doug Sterner, a military historian who runs the Home of Heroes website. “He now has a different role to serve.”

On Tuesday, Giunta will receive the medal at a White House ceremony. He’ll stand on stage before his family, fellow Soldiers and Defense Department leaders as President Obama describes the heroism the 25-year-old displayed on Oct. 25, 2007, when he challenged a pair of Taliban fighters at point-blank range to rescue a wounded comrade who was being dragged away. And then he’ll shake the president’s hand and receive his medal as dozens of photographers and video cameras record every second.

Army officials haven’t said what Giunta’s future responsibilities will entail, or whether he’ll be allowed to deploy again to Afghanistan with the 173rd Airborne Brigade. During his unit’s last rotation, he was kept behind as part of the rear detachment’s support mission.

Sterner said any future combat is unlikely.

“Since World War II, it has been highly unusual to send a Medal of Honor recipient back into battle,” he said. “The last thing in the world the military wants is to see one of these guys killed in action.”

It’s happened before, although officials at the Congressional Medal of Honor Society couldn’t say how many times.

Navy Lt. Cmdr. Edward “Butch” O’Hare received a Medal of Honor for his heroics in 1942 and was shot down by friendly fire over the Pacific Ocean a year later. Marine Sgt. John Basilone was honored for heroism on Guadalcanal in 1942 but was killed during the first day of fighting on Iwo Jima in 1945. Army Maj. Gen. Keith Ware was awarded the medal for actions in France in 1944 but was killed in action in Vietnam 24 years later.

Most recipients have been pushed to noncombat roles, either recruiting or training. Sterner said that Giunta very well may go back to Afghanistan “but in a morale-boosting or inspirational role.”

Back at his home base, Guinta’s role and stature will be immediately affected by the honor.

Under federal law, Medal of Honor recipients are guaranteed a $1,000 monthly pension from the Department of Veterans Affairs, invitations to presidential inaugurations, special base passes for family members and “on base billeting commensurate with the prestige associated with the Medal of Honor.”

In the last week, Army officials have kept Giunta‘s media availability to a minimum, hoping not to overshadow the White House ceremony. But that didn’t stop a crush of new media coverage.

Filmmakers behind the documentary “Restrepo” released a new cut of their film last week to include more about his heroics. And Iowa Public Television recorded its own documentary on Giunta, including interviews with friends and family from his hometown of Hiawatha, population 6,500.


©
This article is provided courtesy of Stars and Stripes, which got its start as a newspaper for Union troops during the Civil War, and has been published continuously since 1942 in Europe and 1945 in the Pacific. Stripes reporters have been in the field with American soldiers, sailors and airmen in World War II, Korea, the Cold War, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Bosnia and Kosovo, and are now on assignment in the Middle East.

Stars and Stripes has one of the widest distribution ranges of any newspaper in the world. Between the Pacific and European editions, Stars and Stripes services over 50 countries where there are bases, posts, service members, ships, or embassies.

Ceremony Link: http://www.whitehous...alvatore-giunta

Recipient speaks: http://shock.militar...t=222830&page=1
Story, Link updated by Army Greens: http://en.wikipedia....alvatore_Giunta
At: http://www.gamingbro...ate-than-never/
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#25 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 22 June 2011 - 05:08 PM

Via military.com: http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl

Soldiers Tell Top NCO They Want MultiCam

June 21, 2011
Military.com|by Christian Lowe

Last week, the U.S. Army celebrated its 236th birthday by formally announcing that it would abandon the black beret with all but a select few uniforms. At the time, Sgt. Maj. of the Army Raymond Chandler III said the beret was the top uniform complaint from Soldiers he'd surveyed in the field.

But during an interview with military bloggers on June 20, Chandler admitted that in addition to the beret complaints, he was hearing that Soldiers wanted to do away with their current camo uniforms and adopt the pattern now being worn by their counterparts in Afghanistan.

"A lot of the Soldiers brought up that they just want to have the MultiCam, or Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage pattern, as the standard design for all uniforms," Chandler said.

The Army did a radical about-face in 2009, adopting the MultiCam pattern developed by New York-based design firm Crye Precision to replace its so-called Universal Camo Pattern for Soldiers deployed to Afghanistan. The Operation Enduring Freedom Camo Pattern, or OCP, is popular due to how it blends into the varied backgrounds across the combat zone.

Chandler's predecessor, Sgt. Maj. Kenneth Preston, told Military.com last summer he believed the service was right to shift away from the universal camouflage pattern adopted in 2005 to the MultiCam scheme.

"The OCP allows the Soldiers to get far closer to potential enemies before being observed," Preston said. "I believe [Soldiers] are safer" wearing the OCP.

The Army launched a follow-up program late last year to see whether MultiCam or a family of patterns designed for different climates would be a better fit Army-wide than the UCP.

The $10 million effort led by Program Executive Office Soldier will lead to a pattern for desert and arid climates, one for jungle and woodland zones and another so-called "transitional" pattern that will work in a wide range of potential combat zones. The Army will also select a fourth pattern to camouflage its tactical gear -- such as body armor covers and magazine pouches -- that can blend with all three.

Though Chandler emphasized cost savings as a factor in several uniform modification ideas, he dodged questions about the cost of fielding a family of camo patterns while the service is already buying OCP uniforms and gear for Afghanistan-bound troops and Soldiers seem to want the pattern for universal use.

"We're not going to do that," Chandler said of adopting MultiCam uniforms for all Soldiers. "We're looking at a new Army uniform through a very deliberate process with using some technology in industry to figure out a better pattern that works in more than just Afghanistan."
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#26 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 22 June 2011 - 05:18 PM

Via Miliatary.com: http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl

Muslim Soldier Opposed to War Faces Porn Charge

June 15, 2011
Associated Press

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - A Muslim soldier from Fort Campbell has been approved as a conscientious objector to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but he has now been charged with possession of child pornography.

Pfc. Naser Abdo, a 21-year-old infantry soldier, applied for the status last year after he decided Islamic standards would prohibit his service in the U.S. Army in any war. The Army approved his status in May, but his discharge is on hold until the criminal charge is resolved.

He faces an Article 32 hearing, similar to a civilian grand jury, on Wednesday at the installation on the Tennessee-Kentucky state line. Abdo says he intends to fight the charge, which he believes is part of ongoing discrimination within the Army.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#27 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 22 June 2011 - 05:24 PM

Hahaha, this is what you get for impersonating a Soldier, hahaha, menso!

Via military.com: http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl

Man Charged With Being Fake Army Ranger, Larceny

June 21, 2011
Connecticut Post

A Greenwich man picked to speak at a Memorial Day event in town about his four tours of duty in Afghanistan turned out to be a fraud, police said.

Jesus M. Garcia, 20, wore a military uniform in public. He claimed he had been wounded while in the Middle East. And he asked friends, family and the public for money to help pay for medical services and other costs.

But Garcia was never actually in the U.S. Army as he had claimed, police said.

Garcia didn't get a chance to speak at the Memorial Day event, and now, he finds himself in a lot of legal trouble.

On Thursday, Greenwich police arrested Garcia, on a warrant for larceny charges and for impersonating a member of the military, according to police spokesman Lt. Kraig Gray.

After an investigation by Greenwich police, military officials confirmed that Garcia had never been in the Army, Gray said in a news release.

Despite the fact he never served, Garcia, who also lists a residence in Hopewell Junction, N.Y., portrayed himself as a former Army Ranger who had been wounded in combat.

Garcia's deceit started to unravel when he met with Greenwich Police Captain James Heavey on May 27, before Garcia was set to speak at the Memorial Day ceremony.

Heavey said that during conversations with Garcia it became apparent that he was a fraud, police said.

An officer began an investigation and Garcia provided a false name and date of birth to him. Garcia was arrested that day and charged with interfering with an officer.

As the investigation into Garcia continued, police said they learned that there were two financial victims of his fraud. They also learned of other incidents where Garcia had publicly posed in uniform as a Soldier, including on his Facebook page.

Police said they discovered that Garcia split his time living between his two homes and was able to explain his extended absences from his Greenwich residence while he was in Hopewell Junction as military-related and vice versa.

Garcia, who lives in an apartment on Armstrong Court while in Greenwich, was charged with felony fifth-degree larceny, sixth-degree larceny, four counts of fraudulent use of military insignia and false representation of an armed forces uniform.

Garcia was released after posting $2,500 bond and is set to appear in Superior Court in Stamford on June 24.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#28 ThatDude407

ThatDude407

    Sgt USMC

  • Administrators
  • 7509 posts
  • LocationRight behind You

Posted 23 June 2011 - 05:52 AM

View Postamiaturtle, on 22 June 2011 - 05:24 PM, said:

Hahaha, this is what you get for impersonating a Soldier, hahaha, menso!

Via military.com: http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl

Man Charged With Being Fake Army Ranger, Larceny

June 21, 2011
Connecticut Post

A Greenwich man picked to speak at a Memorial Day event in town about his four tours of duty in Afghanistan turned out to be a fraud, police said.

Jesus M. Garcia, 20, wore a military uniform in public. He claimed he had been wounded while in the Middle East. And he asked friends, family and the public for money to help pay for medical services and other costs.

But Garcia was never actually in the U.S. Army as he had claimed, police said.

Garcia didn't get a chance to speak at the Memorial Day event, and now, he finds himself in a lot of legal trouble.

On Thursday, Greenwich police arrested Garcia, on a warrant for larceny charges and for impersonating a member of the military, according to police spokesman Lt. Kraig Gray.

After an investigation by Greenwich police, military officials confirmed that Garcia had never been in the Army, Gray said in a news release.

Despite the fact he never served, Garcia, who also lists a residence in Hopewell Junction, N.Y., portrayed himself as a former Army Ranger who had been wounded in combat.

Garcia's deceit started to unravel when he met with Greenwich Police Captain James Heavey on May 27, before Garcia was set to speak at the Memorial Day ceremony.

Heavey said that during conversations with Garcia it became apparent that he was a fraud, police said.

An officer began an investigation and Garcia provided a false name and date of birth to him. Garcia was arrested that day and charged with interfering with an officer.

As the investigation into Garcia continued, police said they learned that there were two financial victims of his fraud. They also learned of other incidents where Garcia had publicly posed in uniform as a Soldier, including on his Facebook page.

Police said they discovered that Garcia split his time living between his two homes and was able to explain his extended absences from his Greenwich residence while he was in Hopewell Junction as military-related and vice versa.

Garcia, who lives in an apartment on Armstrong Court while in Greenwich, was charged with felony fifth-degree larceny, sixth-degree larceny, four counts of fraudulent use of military insignia and false representation of an armed forces uniform.

Garcia was released after posting $2,500 bond and is set to appear in Superior Court in Stamford on June 24.


heres what gave it away for me "Jesus M. Garcia, 20" the kid is 20 how in the hell can he serve 4 tours... my tours were between 6 - 8 months, so if he joined the military right at 18, skipped basic, AND tech school. then i guess it could be possible....


Posted Image
Posted Image


#29 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 23 June 2011 - 10:49 AM

Quote

heres what gave it away for me "Jesus M. Garcia, 20" the kid is 20 how in the hell can he serve 4 tours... my tours were between 6 - 8 months, so if he joined the military right at 18, skipped basic, AND tech school. then i guess it could be possible....
exactly, that or he would have had to go in at like 16, lol.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#30 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 28 June 2011 - 03:01 PM

And yet again, another idiot gets in trouble for inpersonating a Soldier, don't they know it's against the law. Piche Menso!

Via Military.com: http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl

Man Charged With Impersonating Soldier at Airport

June 28, 2011
Knight Ridder/Tribune

NEW YORK -- A Long Island man has been arrested after impersonating military personnel while on an international American Airlines flight.

According to authorities, Rock Diaz, 22, of Freeport, Long Island, was arrested Friday night at John F. Kennedy airport.

Diaz, who was traveling from the Dominican Republic to New York, arrived at the airport dressed in fatigues. He had gotten an upgrade from coach to first class based on his military service.

While making his way through customs, a Port Authority official inquired about his rank in the Army. Diaz then gave an answer, according to reports, that did not match up to the insignia on his uniform. He claimed to be an "E-5" but his patch showed he was a staff sergeant, which is an "E-6."

Diaz also wore a black POW patch on his sleeve, which no real Soldier would place there, the New York Post reported.

When asked where he was stationed, Diaz had no response. He also could not show a military ID to corroborate his story. He was later detained at the airport.

Investigators said Diaz had pulled the same scam before. In December 2009, he talked his way into the cockpit of a jet, where he was photographed sitting at the controls of the plane.

Diaz is being charged with second-degree impersonation, a felony.

*Note the following, via: http://apps.leg.wa.g...?cite=9A.60.045

RCW 9A.60.045
Criminal impersonation in the second degree.
(1) A person is guilty of criminal impersonation in the second degree if the person:
(a)(i) Claims to be a law enforcement officer or creates an impression that he or she is a law enforcement officer; and
(ii) Under circumstances not amounting to criminal impersonation in the first degree, does an act with intent to convey the impression that he or she is acting in an official capacity and a reasonable person would believe the person is a law enforcement officer; or
(b) Falsely assumes the identity of a veteran or active duty member of the armed forces of the United States with intent to defraud for the purpose of personal gain or to facilitate any unlawful activity.
(2) Criminal impersonation in the second degree is a gross misdemeanor.
[2004 c 124 § 1; 2004 c 11 § 2; 2003 c 53 § 79.]
Notes:
Reviser's note: This section was amended by 2004 c 11 § 2 and by 2004 c 124 § 1, each without reference to the other. Both amendments are incorporated in the publication of this section under RCW 1.12.025(2). For rule of construction, see RCW 1.12.025(1).
Effective date -- 2004 c 124: "This act takes effect July 1, 2004." [2004 c 124 § 2.]
Effective date -- 2004 c 11: See note following RCW 9A.60.040.
Intent -- Effective date -- 2003 c 53: See notes following RCW 2.48.180.

*Washington Criminal Impersonation – Second Degree – Penalties & Laws
Second degree criminal impersonation is applicable when you claim to be or create the impression that you are a peace officer or falsely assume the identity of a veteran or active duty military member with intent to defraud.
Criminal impersonation in the 2nd degree is a gross misdemeanor and is punishable by up to one year in jail and fines up to $5,000.
Ref: RCW 9A.60.045
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#31 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 19 July 2011 - 02:49 PM

Via Military.com Link with video: http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl

Army Ranger Receives Medal of Honor

July 12, 2011
Associated Press

WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama presented the nation's highest military honor Tuesday to Sgt. 1st Class Leroy Arthur Petry after describing how the Soldier took enemy fire in Afghanistan but still grabbed a live grenade to save his comrades. "This is the stuff of which heroes are made," the president declared.

It was just the second time that a living, active-duty service member from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has received a Medal of Honor. Petry, who lost his hand in the incident and wears a prosthesis, looked on from a stage in the East Room with his wife and children in the audience as the president described his heroics that day.

It unfolded on May 26, 2008, in the remote east of Afghanistan, as Petry - then a staff sergeant - and other Rangers choppered toward an insurgent compound, the president said. As soon as they landed they came under automatic weapon fire, and Petry was hit in his legs. He fell, but as grenades came flying toward him and his comrades he picked one up and tried to hurl it back before it exploded. Petry's right hand was blown off but two of his fellow Soldiers were saved.

And still Petry kept going, issuing orders to help his unit fight and win.

It was "something extraordinary," Obama said.

Even after the incident in Afghanistan, Petry didn't seek to leave the Army, instead staying enlisted and even returning to Afghanistan for an eighth deployment last year, the president said, before hanging the Medal of Honor around Petry's neck.

Petry, a Santa Fe, N.M., native who now serves with the 75th Ranger Regiment at Fort Benning, Ga., spoke to reporters outside the White House after the ceremony. He sought to turn attention away from himself and toward other Rangers, service members and military families.

"To be singled out is very humbling. I consider every one of our men and women in uniform serving here, abroad, to be our heroes," Petry said. "They sacrifice every day and deserve your continued support and recognition."

The first living, active-duty service member who fought in Iraq or Afghanistan to get the Medal of Honor was Staff Sgt. Salvatore Giunta, who received the honor last fall for his actions chasing down the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2007.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#32 Pete

Pete

    Screen Door Ripper

  • Administrators
  • 3090 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey (Monmouth County)

Posted 20 July 2011 - 07:04 AM

kudos to him.
Posted Image
"Golf is a game in which you yell fore, shoot six and write down five"
Posted Image

#33 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 27 September 2011 - 04:41 PM

Army Draw Down. Via: http://www.military....my.nl#community

September 26, 2011
UPI

The U.S. Army plans to reduce its number of Soldiers by nearly 50,000 during a five-year span, a general said.
The Army Times reported Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, service personnel chief, said the reductions would being in March.
The Army will cut forces in various ways, including buyouts, voluntary and involuntary separations and retirements, to bring the total to 520,400 active-duty Soldiers by Sept. 30, 2016, the report said.

Bostick said the Army would focus first on the temporary 22,000-Soldier increase started three years ago to support the troop surge in Afghanistan. A second phase will involve Soldiers added during an expansion that began in 2007.
"We feel that with the demand going down in Iraq and Afghanistan, and given the time to conduct a reasonable drawdown, we can manage [the force reduction] just as we have managed drawdowns in the past," Bostick said.
The Times said the Army has asked Congress to reinstate some separation incentives, including financial ones, that had been used in the 1990s but have since expired.
"We are currently reviewing the lessons drawn from the 1990s as captured in reports by the Army, Congressional Budget Office and the other services to ensure that we retain as much experience as possible from the ongoing conflicts [in Iraq and Afghanistan]," a member of Bostick's staff said.
"As in the 1990s, the Army may need to conduct involuntary separations to meet mandated end-strength, but we will do everything we can to shape the force through competitive promotions, reclassifications and voluntary separations before we take harsher measures," the official said.

*Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick was my Lt. Coronel at Fr. Riley Kansas, 1st Engineer Battalion Commander in the 90's. Nice to see he's still around.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#34 JBlaze

JBlaze

    Major General

  • Administrators
  • 6642 posts
  • LocationFlorida, USA

Posted 28 September 2011 - 03:45 AM

Amurrrrricaaaaaaaaaaa fuck yea!

Follow me on Twitter! @RealJBlaze

Posted Image


#35 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 04 October 2011 - 07:45 PM

Via: http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl

Recognition Sought for Soldier's Heroic Acts

October 03, 2011
Stars and Stripes|by Leo Shane III

WASHINGTON -- When the roadside bomb detonated, it ripped through the fuel tank of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle and ignited like napalm. The seven men seated inside were knocked unconscious and had no chance to escape the fire.

But the gunner, Sgt. 1st Class Alwyn Cashe, managed to crawl out of the burning wreckage. Wounded and drenched in diesel fuel, he pulled the Bradley’s driver from his seat before the flames reached there, dragging him to safety.

And then he went back.

The 16-year Army veteran had seen a dozen of his men die on that tour in Iraq, and he couldn’t bear to lose another. His uniform caught fire as he desperately tried to open the Bradley’s hatch.

By the time he got in, all he had on was his body armor and helmet, the rest of his uniform in ashes or seared to his skin. With help, he carried one of his dying men out of the fire and back to horrified medics trying to triage their charred colleagues.

And then he went back.

Soldiers couldn’t tell what rounds pinging off the Bradley were from insurgents’ weapons and which ones were from their own ammunition ablaze in the vehicle. As he reached the next Soldier, Cashe tried to douse the fire on his uniform, only to realize that his own skin was peeling off from the heat. As another Soldier helped pat out the flames, Cashe moved the next wounded friend to safety.

And then he went back.

Cashe was the last of the injured to be evacuated from the scene. Doctors later said he suffered second- and third-degree burns over 90 percent of his body, but he still walked off the battlefield under his own power.

He spent the next three weeks at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio trying to recover as his men died one by one in adjoining rooms. Of the seven he helped evacuate, five could not survive the burns.

Cashe’s family said that time was full of pain and grief for the platoon sergeant, his only consolation being that some of those Army brothers had the chance to say goodbye to their families.

When his own family asked why he ran into the fire, knowing he would burn, knowing it would cost his life, Cashe told them, “I had made peace with my God, but I didn’t know if my men had yet.”

Cashe was the last from that battle to die. A week after he passed away, the Army awarded him the Silver Star, the third-highest combat military decoration a servicemember can receive for battlefield heroism.

That was six years ago. Now, his family, his men, his commanders and veterans who never met Cashe want to know why this hero -- a man who willingly embraced a painful, fiery death to save his fellow Soldiers -- has not been given the military’s highest award, and the recognition he deserves.

They blame the military’s awards system, a confusing set of seemingly inconsistent rules and unofficial practices that they say, at least in Cashe’s case, have deprived a hero of his rightful recognition.

An honor disparity?

Since 2001, only 10 men have received the Medal of Honor for actions in Iraq or Afghanistan, seven of them posthumously. Critics charge that the military has been stingy in handing out the honor, thereby denigrating the heroics of today’s troops.

For comparison, there were 248 medals awarded during the Vietnam War. That war involved roughly twice as many troops as the current conflicts, but had nearly 25 times the number of top medals.

Pentagon officials insist that today’s fighters aren’t held to a higher standard. But they do note that today’s battlefields are dramatically different than the close-range, hand-to-hand combat seen in previous conflicts.

In a report released to Congress earlier this year, defense personnel officials wrote that technological advancements in weaponry and tactics have resulted in fewer “personal combat actions,” and in turn fewer battlefield heroics.

“Additionally, the fact that we are fighting non-uniformed insurgents who use improvised explosive devices, suicide bombers and other techniques to minimize their exposure to our superior forces and firepower also reduces the number of combat actions,” the report states. “These factors contribute to the disparity in the number of Medals of Honor awarded.”

But many doubt that claim. Doug Sterner, a military historian who has spent years pushing for better awards records, said that he has seen a “systemic failure” in how top military honors are bestowed in recent years. Last month, he petitioned the Secretary of the Army to review all Silver Star and Distinguished Service Cross awards from the last decade to determine whether military commanders are short-selling deserving heroes.

Sterner said he was prompted to send the request after reading Cashe’s story and wondering how his actions did not warrant the Medal of Honor. He believes the low numbers aren’t attributable to stubbornness but instead ignorance of the medal process, and who should qualify.

Receiving the Medal of Honor typically takes years. It requires approval from the hero’s service secretary and, ultimately, the president. Commanders who submit a name need multiple witnesses to attest to the valorous action, plus dozens of pages more documenting the battle.

But awarding the Silver Star can be done by any general or flag officer and requires a small fraction of the work. Many of those honors can be turned around in a month or less, as Cashe’s was.

Military commanders can request an upgrade of those awards later, and commanders involved in Cashe’s case have submitted paperwork asking for consideration of the Medal of Honor. But there’s no fast track for upgrading military honors, and though Cashe’s case was resubmitted in May, the Army has yet to take any action.

In a letter to the Secretary of the Army, Lt. Gen. William Webster -- at the time, the commander of the 3rd Infantry Division, which Cashe fell under -- called Cashe’s actions “remarkable, selfless bravery.”

“Recalling a military career spanning nearly four decades, I cannot remember a story that is its equal,” he wrote. “His actions display the very virtues that lie at the heart of the Medal of Honor.”

‘A poor boy … who made good’

Kasinal Cashe White said if her brother Alwyn didn’t join the Army “he might have ended up in prison with a number across his chest.”

Cashe was the youngest of 10 children, born in an impoverished neighborhood just outside Orlando, Fla. His father died when he was 5, and White said his troubles with teachers and law enforcement escalated as he grew up.

But instead of a tragic downfall, his family boasts of his story as “a poor boy from the projects who made good.” He joined the Army after struggling through high school. His mother objected, but Cashe knew it was where he belonged.

“It was another family for him,” White said. “And he loved it. He was so proud to be in the Army. You should have seen him in his uniform, with his shoes spit-shined, the perfect crease in his pants.”

Charles Jones, who served with Cashe for four years before his death, said he was a prototypical platoon sergeant -- demanding but fair, always working alongside his men rather than issuing orders from the rear. At 35, he was one of the old men of the 1st Battalion, 15th Infantry Regiment, both a role model and friend for many of the younger Soldiers.

Jones said the two bonded over fishing shortly after they met and shared numerous fishing trips in between military duties.

“The night before [the attack], he stopped to make sure and give me the latest [fishing] gear magazine, because he knew I’d want to see it,” Jones said. “He knew his guys. He was one of the best leaders we had.”

Jon-Ray Falgout, who was a young private when the 1-15 deployed to Iraq in 2005, remembers Cashe as a tough guy who liked to laugh.

“He didn’t expect any more out of you than he was willing to do, but he didn’t expect any less either,” Falgout said.

Cashe met his wife, Tamara, in the service, and had three children before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Relatives said they knew he’d be among the first to volunteer for combat overseas. White remembers chastising him before his unit left for Iraq in early 2005, telling him “not to be a hero” and to come home safe.

“He had always said he would never leave one of his boys behind,” she said.

Broken body but strong spirit

The Bradley attack that took Cashe’s life happened Oct. 17, 2005. By then, Jones said, their battalion had lost too many Soldiers to roadside bombs and sniper fire.

“It was like hell over there,” he said. “We left with about 16 Bradleys and we barely brought any back with us. The day after [Cashe’s heroism], I was in a Bradley that got caught in the same place and blew up our fuel tanks too. But ours didn’t spark, so we got lucky.”

Soldiers who served with Cashe said that attack was the low point of their tour, both for the lives lost and the gruesomeness of the injuries. Jones said he saw one of his best friends, Staff Sgt. George Alexander, being readied for a medevac flight out. His wounds were so severe Jones could barely recognize him. When Jones reached for his hand, his burnt skin flaked off.

“I still have nightmares about that,” he said.

Alexander died on Oct. 22, 2005, five days after the explosion.

The troops were immediately awed by reports of Cashe’s heroism. Battlefield narratives describe Cashe’s uniform and skin on fire for about five minutes while he pulled his men from the vehicle. At one point, another Soldier had to extinguish the blaze on Cashe’s back so the platoon sergeant could continue tending to the wounded men.

“Did it surprise me that he could do all of that? Yes,” Falgout said. “The pain he went through to save those guys … but it didn’t surprise me that he would try to do that. The character he had, he would do something like that.”

None of the burn victims looked like they would survive, but Cashe’s troops and family believed that somehow he would beat the odds. If he could endure the pain of walking through fire again and again, he could find a way to recover.

White said she never believed her brother would die until just hours before he passed. His body was broken but his spirit was not. Throughout the three weeks at Brooke Army Medical Center, he kept asking for updates on the men he pulled from the Bradley and the ones still fighting in Iraq.

“I didn’t really understand at the time what he had done, but I had Soldiers and families coming up to me and telling me that he was a hero,” she said. “They were saying that because of him, they got to see their husband or son one last time. He was a big kid, and he loved those guys.”

Among Cashe’s last words before dying: “Hooah.”

‘He was safe. But he chose to go back'

The guidelines for the Medal of Honor have not changed since 1963. Nominees must show “conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his or her life above and beyond the call of duty while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States.”At least initially, that last part -- “in action against an enemy” -- is what kept Cashe from being considered for the Medal of Honor. Harry Conner, a friend of White’s family who has helped in the push for upgrading Cashe’s award, said initial battlefield reports did not include details about small-arms fire from insurgents peppering the Bradley as Cashe tried to rescue his men.

The distinction of heroism away from the “battlefield” -- a roadside bomb explosion isn’t considered an active battlefield for medal purposes -- left commanders in Cashe’s unit to push for the Silver Star instead of a higher award.

But that wasn’t the only factor.

In a 2009 memo recommending Cashe’s award upgrade, his former operational division commander, Maj. Gen. Joe Taluto, wrote that the Silver Star seemed the most appropriate award at the time because “up to that point very few Soldiers were recommended for the Silver Star or above awards.”

Sterner said that raises the question of whether commanders have been self-regulating the valor medals, aiming low because of an internal perception that nearly no actions are worthy of the Medal of Honor.

“If running into a burning Bradley over and over again isn’t worth the Medal of Honor, I don’t know what is,” he said.

Col. Gary Brito, Cashe’s battalion commander at the time, said he knew little of the awards process when he recommended Cashe for the Silver Star. His focus was on keeping his men alive and focused following that latest spate of deaths. It wasn’t until months later, after he returned from Iraq, that the lesser honor started to gnaw at him.

“If you look at the individuals who have received the medal in recent years, his story belongs right there as well,” he said. “We weren’t thinking about awards then. But once I had a chance to sit back and look at it again, I became convinced it was something he deserved.”

He’s now leading the push to get Cashe’s honor upgraded.

Officials in the Secretary of the Army’s office said late last week that Sterner’s letter had arrived and would be passed along to the secretary. Conner and White said they’ve heard from several lawmakers and military officials who are pushing the issue behind the scenes, but they remain frustrated that no action has happened yet. “If he were to get the medal, it wouldn’t really change anything,” White said. “We know he is a hero. But it would be getting Al what he deserved. I know they gave him the Silver Star, but he deserves this.”

In a memo advocating an upgrade to the award, Brigadier Gen. Steve Salazar, the brigade commander in 2005, wrote that Cashe “consciously, deliberately, willingly subjected himself to the excruciating pain and suffering of flame and smoke to save his soldiers and continue the mission. I know no braver, selfless act.” Soldiers who served with Cashe echoed that sentiment, saying that a Medal of Honor for his bravery would bring greater recognition to his heroism.

“He got out of that [bomb blast] alive,” Falgout said. “He was safe. But he chose to go back in for his guys. “He could have sat out, but he didn’t. He went back in and got them. That’s definitely a hero.”

©
This article is provided courtesy of Stars and Stripes, which got its start as a newspaper for Union troops during the Civil War, and has been published continuously since 1942 in Europe and 1945 in the Pacific. Stripes reporters have been in the field with American soldiers, sailors and airmen in World War II, Korea, the Cold War, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Bosnia and Kosovo, and are now on assignment in the Middle East.

Stars and Stripes has one of the widest distribution ranges of any newspaper in the world. Between the Pacific and European editions, Stars and Stripes services over 50 countries where there are bases, posts, service members, ships, or embassies.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#36 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 31 January 2012 - 04:17 PM

Via: Military.com ( http://www.military....ml?ESRC=army.nl )

US to Send Floating Commando Base to Mideast


January 28, 2012
Agence France-Presse

The U.S. military plans to send a large floating base for commando teams to the Middle East amid rising tensions with Iran and intensifying fighting in Yemen, The Washington Post reported Saturday. Citing unspecified procurement documents, the newspaper said the Navy is converting an aging amphibious transport docking ship it had planned to decommission, the USS Ponce, into a makeshift staging base for the commandos in response to requests from U.S. Central Command. Unofficially dubbed a "mothership," the floating base could accommodate smaller high-speed boats and helicopters commonly used by Navy SEALs, the report said. Special operations forces are a key part of President Barack Obama's strategy to make the military leaner and more agile as the Pentagon confronts at least $487 billion in spending cuts over the next decade, the paper noted.

Mike Kafka, a spokesman for the Navy's Fleet Forces Command, declined to elaborate on the floating base's purpose or to say where, exactly, it will be deployed in the Middle East, The Post said.

Other Navy officials acknowledged that they were moving with unusual haste to complete the conversion and send the mothership to the region by early summer, the report said.
Navy documents indicate that it could be headed to the Persian Gulf, where Iran has threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, The Post noted.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#37 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 20 March 2012 - 11:40 AM

Talk about the forgotten Soldier.

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

http://video.foxnews...rans-discovered
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

#38 ThatDude407

ThatDude407

    Sgt USMC

  • Administrators
  • 7509 posts
  • LocationRight behind You

Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:03 PM

holy shit... thats like 45 mins from where i live


Posted Image
Posted Image


#39 amiaturtle

amiaturtle

    Specialist

  • Members
  • 2685 posts
  • LocationCarson, California, United States of America.

Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:27 AM

View PostThatDude407, on 20 March 2012 - 01:03 PM, said:

holy shit... thats like 45 mins from where i live
So go visit them mang.

Via: Military.com

Disabled Soldier Backlog Puts Army at Risk

March 26, 2012
Military.com|by Michael Hoffman

The backlog of soldiers too injured to serve is growing so large that it could affect the Army’s ability to go to war.
Army leaders plan to reduce the size of the service by 10,000 to 15,000 soldiers each year over the next decade, but that’s not counting the 20,500 troops Army doctors have declared unable to serve.
Budget cuts, combined with the end of the Iraq war and drawdown in Afghanistan, have forced the Army to cut end strength by 80,000 soldiers. The 20,500 soldiers tabbed to leave the service because of disabilities, however, still remain on the books.
The backlog is caused by failures in a system built to transition those soldiers out. Quite simply, Army doctors classify more soldiers as too injured to serve than the system can separate each year.
The number of soldiers in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System has grown by 42 percent just this past year. It’s grown from 11,900 soldiers to 20,500 soldiers since 2009. Army medical leaders expect that number to continue to rise. The Defense Department adopted the IDES -- and it will apply each one of the services -- but the Army is in most dire straits.
Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, the Army’s top manpower officer, described the system to Congress as “fundamentally flawed,” saying, “The biggest area that we need help is in the disability evaluation system.”
“It's long. It's disjointed. We have put money and leadership after this and I'm very concerned that while we're drawing down, this large number of soldiers will remain in the disability evaluation system,” Bostick told the House Armed Services Committee’s military personnel panel in early March.
It’s rare to hear military leaders openly criticize a system under their control. But it’s clear their frustration is mounting.
The growing backlog puts the Army’s readiness at risk because the current end strength takes into account the number of injured soldiers getting ready to separate. The Army mans units at 110 percent so they can deploy at 90 percent of their authorized strength, said Col. Daniel Cassidy, the deputy commander of the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency.
“As the top end gets smaller, it squeezes where the [disability evaluation system population] kind of floats in the margin,” he said.
With end strength shrinking, the Army will not have the cushion to absorb the backlog of soldiers stuck in a disability evaluation system that keeps growing, Cassidy said.
The Army colonel said the Defense Department can only do so much to salvage a system in which rules were laid out by congressional legislation in 1949. “A patchwork of laws and regulations have been put in place,” but it hasn’t been enough, Cassidy said.
“We’ve advocated for a number of years that we really need to reform this. There’s only so much we can do within the constraints of this law that was created in 1949,” Cassidy said. “We have to reform this system.”
In a perfect world, Army leaders would prefer a system that allowed the service to make a fitness decision and then hand a soldier off to the VA to decide what disability rating he or she receives, Cassidy said.
The Army and the Defense Department as a whole have made changes to the system as recently as 2007. Officials have incrementally introduced the new system to each one of its 34 installations over the past four years.
Those changes have cut down the time it takes for servicemembers to receive benefits from 540 days down to 400. But that’s still unacceptable for Army leadership.
Army officials have set a goal to process 60 percent of soldiers through the disability evaluation system in 295 days by the end of the year. The process runs the gamut from the time a soldier receives a medical referral from Army doctors to the time he or she receives Defense Department and Veterans Affairs benefits after a discharge.
To accomplish this, the Army is working to standardize the process across an enterprise that Army officials admit is confusing for soldiers and their families.
“The process has about 10 sub-processes in it and about 155 processing steps. It crosses eight functional activities. It crosses two departments in the Army; the personnel department and the medical department, and it crosses the department of the VA,” Cassidy said. “It is a very complex process to manage because of all of those touch points.”
Army officials have also tried to launch the process into the new century. Rather than physically mail records between the Army and the VA, the two departments finally started to digitally exchange records in March. This will save seven to 10 days alone, Cassidy said.
What’s truly holding the Army medical command back is a lack of staffing. There are not enough doctors or physical evaluation board liaison officers, better known as PEBLOs, to process the soldiers.
The Army is adding 1,400 people this year to its disability evaluation staff, but it will take a while to train the new staff and make gains toward reducing the backlog.
“We can’t just, out on the open market, a buy a bunch of medical evaluation board doctors. The training it takes to teach the providers how to evaluate and asses those conditions can take up to a year’s worth of time and effort of on the job training,” said Col. Gregory Swanson, the Integrated Disability System’s chief for the IDS Task Force, Army Medical Command.
It’s not only injured active-duty soldiers the Army is worried about separating. A quarter of the backlog is made up of Guardsmen and reservists who often have to travel long distances for appointments. For example, most soldiers who live in Alaska have to fly to Seattle to see an Army doctor.
That’s changing as the Army and VA are working to empower local facilities to offer those appointments to veterans.
“For some reservists, they had to even miss work just to travel all the way to their appointments. That wasn’t fair to them or their families, so we’re working on that,” Cassidy said.
Changes like these help, but Cassidy often returns to his main point when discussing the system: Wholesale change is needed.
“The Army does think we need to fundamentally change the [disability evaluation system.] Statutory reform is the only way to achieve a system that really is worthy of the sacrifices of our force in this era of persistent conflict,” Cassidy said.
The Lord said, "What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground... A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth."

For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling